Tubal Reversal Blog May, 2008

Submitted by Dr. Monteith
Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center

Many doctors will give you less than a warm response when you ask about tubal ligation reversal. Ever wonder why?

I would like to use myself as an example. I started my obstetrics and gynecology (ob/gyn) residency in July 1997 and finished in June 2001. I never saw a single tubal reversal operation performed at the university where I trained. Not one. I saw many unusual and rare things, but I never saw a tubal ligation reversal. I am not alone. Many other doctors would probably tell you the same thing if you asked them.

Lack of Familiarity or Training

Most doctors- especially those who have trained within the last 15 years – are unfamiliar with tubal ligation reversal. The reason is simple. Ligation reversal is considered elective surgery. As a result, these procedures are rarely done in hospitals. Therefore, doctors in training get little or no exposure to these surgical procedures. Because of this, most doctors have little knowledge about these types of operations.

Sometimes doctors in training will reason that if they never saw a particular operation, the surgery does not exist because it is not beneficial and may even be harmful. Of course, this is faulty reasoning.

I would have never thought ligation reversal is an effective surgery if it were not for a three minute experience I had when I was a second year resident doing my reproductive endocrinology rotation.

I was with a physician who was the head of our reproductive endocrinology department. We were counseling a 38-year-old patient who was married, had a tubal ligation and wanted to become pregnant again. At the conclusion of her visit, she had asked what she should do? Since I had seen every patient with fallopian tube problems treated with in-vitro fertilization (IVF), I mumbled to myself, “We are going to recommend you get IVF.” Before I could finish my mumbled response, the director said, “I recommend you get a tubal ligation reversal.” My mouth dropped open! Why did we recommend an operation that we did not perform and one I had never seen? I remember exactly what he said next, “We can do this procedure for you. The cost of tubal reversal will be $15,000 here at the hospital. I recommend you talk with Dr. Gary Berger, a tubal reversal specialist who does them for considerably less cost.”

After the conversation, I asked him why we didn’t do tubal reversal procedures at our hospital. He responded, “Charles, we have to charge patients more for this surgery in the hospital. Since patients have to pay out of pocket, most people will be unable to afford the surgery with us. This is a great procedure for her because she will have the ability to get pregnant many times.”

“But isn’t the success rate less than 50 percent?”, I asked. He dropped his glasses down, looked over the rims and told me in a very direct voice, “No! In the best of hands, the success rate is 80 percent.” Somehow he seemed offended that I thought he had recommended a bad treatment.

This conversation happened in 1998. I filed this brief exchange in my memory and mostly forgot about it for the rest of my training.

Other Mistaken Ideas Doctors May Have

Many doctors might say a general ob/gyn resident would not see any of these surgeries while training, but a doctor in training as a reproductive endocrinologist would. Unfortunately, this is not true. I had two friends who trained to be reproductive endocrinology specialists. One did two tubal reversals over a three year period of training, the other did none.

It is unfortunate that my friends, who had little or no experience with reversal surgery, are going to be the same doctors who will counsel patients about it. No wonder they routinely recommend IVF – a treatment that they received almost exclusive training in during their fellowship programs.

Why I Came to Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center

I hope my personal experience can illustrate why general ob/gyn doctors may not support their patients who want to have their tubal ligations reversed, and why reproductive specialists mostly do IVF. I view tubal ligation reversal as a disappearing surgical skill that may not be available to patients in the future. This is why I asked to join Dr. Berger’s staff at Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center. To help women with tubal ligations who want to get pregnant is the reason why I have decided to embark on the path to become a tubal ligation reversal specialist.

At Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center, we want to maximize the chances for pregnancy after tubal ligation reversal for all of our patients. One step that is helpful in planning for a tubal reversal procedure is examining the pathology report from a patient’s medical record. Pathology reports can provide critical information to a tubal reversal specialist since they convey additional information beyond what is contained in the operative report describing the tubal ligation.

What is a pathology report?

A pathology report- sometimes shortened to ‘path report’- is a typed report from a pathologist (doctor who studies healthy and diseased tissue) that describes the removed tubal segments. Usually when tissue is removed by a surgical operation, it is sent to a pathologist for examination. After this examination, a pathologist will create a typed report describing what was observed.

When a tubal ligation and resection procedure has been performed, a segment of fallopian tube was removed and most likely sent to a pathologist. Therefore, a pathology report should exist in the patient’s medical record. When a sterilization has been performed by tubal electrocautery or with tubal clips or rings, there will not be a pathology report because no tubal tissue is removed with these tubal ligation methods.

A pathology report will help our tubal reversal doctors determine exactly what was done during a ligation and resection procedure and what your chances of tubal reversal success will be.

Examples of Pathology Reports After Tubal Ligation

Here are some examples of what the pathology reports may show after a tubal ligation and resection:

Scenario 1
Operative note states, “A standard ligation and resection was done.” Pathology report states, “Two 1.5 cm isthmic sections of fallopian tube were examined.” In this case, the pathology report confirms that small amounts of isthmic tubal segments were removed and the chance of successful ligation reversal is very good.

Scenario 2

Operative note states, “A bilateral ligation was done…tubes were resected.” Pathology report states, “Two 4 cm sections of fallopian tube were examined and fimbrial ends were present on both sections.” In this case, the pathology report demonstrates that the patient has had a fimbriectomy. We would advise the patient that fimbrectomy reversal will be the appropriate procedure to reverse this type of tubal ligation.

Scenario 3
Operative note states, “A typical bilateral tubal ligation was done.” Pathology report states, “Two 7 cm section of fallopian tubes were examined.” In this case, the pathology report shows that large amounts of tubal length were removed. This is not a typical bilateral tubal ligation, and the chance of a reversing tubal ligation is remote. In this case, we would advise the patient that IVF would be a better treatment option for her than tubal reversal surgery.

Get Expert Opinion

As tubal reversal experts who specialize in ‘untying tied tubes’,  we have found that most tubal ligations are reversible. Any patient considering ligation reversal should send us a copy of their operative report and, if ligation and resection was done, a copy of the pathology report. We will review these reports, without charge, and provide the best recommendation for becoming pregnant after tubal ligation.

Submitted by Dr. Charles Monteith
Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center