Tubal Reversal Blog ‘berger’

At the age of 32, Rebecca underwent a tubal ligation in 1995. Within one year, she began to notice worsening menstrual symptoms which were attributed to Post Tubal Ligation Syndrome (PTLS). She dealt with these symptoms for 12 years before deciding to undergo tubal ligation reversal surgery.

Her story prior to tubal ligation reversal can be read in the article entitled Meet Rebecca. Rebecca reported her symptoms after tubal ligation as:

Loss of libido
Losing more that the normal amount of hair daily
Unexplained Weight gain
Loss of sexual arousal
Loss of natural lubrication
Painful intercourse
Depression
Isolation
Spotting
Heavier cycles
Unexplained Joint pain
Migraine headaches
Severe Mood Swings
Severe Temperature fluctuations

Rebecca’s Tubal Reversal Surgery

Rebecca underwent an outpatient tubal ligation reversal in July 2008. Drs Berger and Monteith performed her surgery. Rebecca’s fallopian tubes were found to be in good condition and she had a successful bilateral, microsurgical tubotubal anastamosis. Her surgery lasted 88 minutes. She was subsequently released to the local Sheraton hotel, was seen the next day by a Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center staff member, and was then discharged to home. She has recovered from reversal surgery without any complications.

Rebecca After Surgery

Rebecca’s report on her symptoms since having reversal surgery:

As far as my symptoms at this point:
I believe it is too early to really notice any changes but here are the few that I am aware of this month.
I am thinking about intimacy once again and I feel that my libido is coming back.
Intercourse was not painful.
My headache this month lasted only one day.
My moods are still erratic and my hair continues to fall out.
I plan to keep track of my feelings, including the desire for intimacy, and sexual arousal signs; in addition to other symptoms.
I believe hormone testing is important before and after a tubal reversal. Perhaps every 3 to 6 months along with keeping a journal of menstrual symptoms.

CHTRC Series of Worsening Menstrual Problems After Tubal Ligation

This is the twelfth article in our fourteen part series on PTLS and associated medical conditions. Our first article, Pain After Tubes Tied: Symptom of Post Tubal Ligation Syndrome?, reviews symptoms associated with PTLS.

Our next several articles will continue to present patients who have suffered from worsening menstrual, physical, and emotional symptoms after surgical sterilization procedures ( women who had their tubes tied).

Readers can also view other patient submitted stories about their menstrual symptoms, reasons for reversing tubal ligation, and outcomes after reversal reversal surgery. Each patient’s story is listed below:

Meet Momzilla
Meet Andrea
Meet Praybelieving
Meet Katherine

We invite readers to join our Tubal Reversal Message Board and discuss and share personal experiences with tubal ligation. We also have a dedicated PTLS forum for readers to share experiences of worsening symptoms after tubal ligation procedures.

Momzilla came to us at Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center seeking relief of problems that occurred after her tubal ligation. Momzilla is her sign-on name for the tubal reversal message board. She is 43 years old, happily married, and has three children. She is employed as a human resource manager and her husband is an attorney.

Momzilla had her tubal ligation three years ago and she describes the gradual onset of Post Tubal Ligation Symptoms (PTLS) after her tubal ligation. We asked her if we could use her as the subject of a blog featuring several of our patients. She agreed and provided us a comprehensive list of her physical problems.

Her symptoms in her own words…

“Longer clotty periods with a day or so of flooding blood followed by nothing and then bleeding again. (My menstrual periods from the dawn of time prior to that had been regular and predictable to almost the day), horrible insomnia, light-headedness/dizziness (almost passing out on a few occasions), exaggerated PMS and mood swings, absence of libido and an aversion to sex, fatigue, a sense of dread or doom (not depression), withdrawal from my family (almost needing isolation from people), inability to concentrate, fogginess and an awful memory, tingling in extremities, very dry skin no matter how much I drink or how much lotion I used, more frequent headaches, bloating and GI issues, inability to lose my baby weight (I lost my waist), breaking hair that is more oily, breaking nails, changes in perspiration and body odor (sweating and smelling more easily), bad taste in my mouth, more sinusitis and allergies…I think that about covers it..”

She also had told us she had tingling in her legs, which required her to see a neurologist and have a brain MRI. She also had increased sugar cravings and gained 15 lbs.

Momzilla told us her story of having a tubal ligation and then noticing the onset of these symptoms. She has seen several doctors and had a variety of inconclusive tests. She found information about PTLS on the Internet and discovered Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center as well. She was very clear she was not getting a ligation reversal so she could have more kids. She was trying to get her body to be like it was prior to the ligation. She desired a return to her normal state.

I am happy to report Momzilla had a successful tubal ligation reversal on June 2, 2008. Her surgery went well and was performed by Drs. Berger and Monteith. She had good tubal lengths and did well in the recovery room. She was released to the local Sheraton hotel for an overnight stay and was discharged home the next morning. She has recovered without any complications.

Readers can read about Momzilla’s after surgery report: Momzilla Reveals Her True Identity.

We will also publish reports on patients who have suffered from worsening menstrual, physical, and emotional symptoms after surgical sterilization procedures (women who had their tubes tied).

We invite readers to join our Tubal reversal message board and discuss and share personal experiences with tubal ligation. We also have a dedicated PTLS forum for readers to share experiences of worsening symptoms after tubal ligation procedures.

Tubal Reversal Scholarly Publications

Early Experimental Studies in Animals

In 1969, David, Brackett and Garcia ⁽¹⁾ reported using microsurgical techniques for uterotubal anastomosis after removing the uterotubal junction from one side in 25 rabbits. Among 11 (44%) of the animals that became pregnant, fewer implantations occurred on the operated side than on the unoperated side. This showed that the uterotubal junction has a role, but is not absolutely required, in transferring embryos from the fallopian tube into the uterus for implantation.

In 1974, Paterson and Wood ⁽²⁾ divided the isthmic segment of one fallopian tube and then performed tubal anastomosis in 10 rabbits. They removed the fallopian tube and ovary on the other side so that any pregnancies that followed could be attributed to the repaired fallopian tube. The pregnancy rate was 60%. These investigators suggested that tubal anastomosis could be applied successfully to humans for reversal of tubal sterilization.

Hulka and Ulberg ⁽³⁾ in 1975 were the first to perform a successful reversal of tubal sterilization under experimental conditions. Six weeks after applying Hulka clips to the isthmic portion of fallopian tubes in 8 pigs, they removed the clipped portion of tubes and performed tubal anastomosis using an absorbable, multifilament suture (6-0 Dexon). Six (75%) of the animals subsequently became pregnant.

In 1975 Winston ⁽⁴⁾ reported an experiment in rabbits in which the experimental variables were different suture materials and duration of tubal splinting. In one group of 25 rabbits, he removed a portion of the tubal isthmus or ampulla and then performed tubotubal anastomosis with a nonabsorbable, nonreactive, monofilament suture (10-0 nylon). Using microsurgical technique, Winston took special care to include only the 2 outer layers (muscularis and serosa) of the fallopian tube in the suture line, avoiding the inner tubal layer (endothelium). He stabilized the anastomotic sites with polyethylene splints that were removed before closure of the abdominal cavity. Twenty-three (92%) of the animals became pregnant. This was the highest pregnancy rate reported so far after tubal anastomosis in animal studies. When either 8-0 catgut was used as the suture material or the tubal splint was left in place for 1 week after surgery, the pregnancy rate dropped in half.

Winston’s results were subsequently corroborated using microsurgical tubal anastomosis with 11-0 nylon, intraoperative splinting, and avoiding mucosal trauma from suture in the reconstruction of rabbit oviducts six weeks after application of Falope rings. Eighteen (82%) of 22 rabbits became pregnant after two matings.

Comment

Experimental studies in animals demonstrated excellent pregnancy rates following reconstruction of the fallopian tube by tubal anastomosis. They provided the basis for tubal reversal surgery as a clinical treatment. The best results came using microsurgical techniques with non-reactive, monofilament suture material, intraoperative tubal splints, and avoiding the introduction of suture in the inner layer of the tube.

Dr. Berger uses these surgical techniques in his tubal reversal procedures. For a more complete description of the early history of tubal reversal surgery, read Dr. Berger’s book chapter, Reversal of Female Sterilization: An Evaluation of Results ⁽⁵⁾.

References

1. David A, Brackett BG, Garcia CR: Effects of microsurgical removal of the rabbit uterotubal junction. Fertil Steril 20:250, 1969
2. Hulka JF, Ulberg LC: Reversibility of clip sterilization. Fertil Steril 26:1132, 1975
3. Paterson P, Wood C: The use of microsurgery in the reanastomosis of the rabbit fallopian tube. Fertil Steril 25:757, 1974
4. Winston RML: Microsurgical reanastomosis of the rabbit oviduct and its functional and pathological sequelae. Br I Obstet Gynaecol 82 :513, 1975
5. Berger GS: Reversal of female sterilization: An evaluation of results. In JM Phillips, editor, Microsurgery in Gynecology, Chapter 33. American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, Downey, California, 238-243, 1977.

How Fertility is Restored Through Outpatient Tubal Reversal

This video clip comes from a Discovery Channel production featuring the tubal reversal procedure that I perform. The film crew followed Deborah and Paul Martinez as they proceeded through their tubal reversal journey. The operation was filmed in its entirety and I describe each step as I proceed through the procedure. The video clip available here is only 3 minutes in length, but the entire operation is available in a free videotape or DVD. Originally aired as part of the series, “The Operation”, the film has also been broadcast on TLC (The Learning Channel) and on “The CBS Early Morning Show”.

Order Free Tubal Reversal Video or DVD

The video tape or DVD is free of charge for personal viewing. There is a small charge for shipping and handling.

This video shows step-by-step how I repair the fallopian tubes after a tubal ligation in a one-hour outpatient procedure that is comfortable for the patient and results in very quick recovery.

Once you see this you will understand why patients come to Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center from all over the US as well as from other countries for their tubal reversal procedure. Besides its comfort and fast recovery, my procedure has the highest success rates of any operation to repair the tubes and it more successful than the alternative (and more expensive) treatment of IVF.

http://video.tubal-reversal.net/