Reversing Tubal Ligation and Finding Ovarian Endometriosis
October 30th, 2008
This article profiles a patient who came to Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center for reversing tubal ligation at which time she was found to have ovarian endometriosis.
Travel from California
The patient and her husband traveled from Monterrey, California for tubal ligation reversal. She is 44 years old and is a banker. She has two children from previous marriage, ages 12 and 15. Her husband is a meteorologist. He has two children from a previous marriage, ages 16 and 18. They moved from Texas to California and have been married together for 1 year and 3 months. Together, they desire a child of their own.
IVF Evaluation
Prior to traveling to visit us, they had a consultation with a reproductive endocrinologist near where they live. They expressed dissatisfaction with their consultation because they felt the doctor only wanted to offer them in-vitro fertilization (IVF). They did consider IVF but decided the procedure was not for them. During the preoperative consultation they specifically stated:
“We wanted to have a baby as God intended it.”
They did their own search for tubal reversal doctors and chose to come to Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center because we specialize exclusively in reversing tubal ligation. They felt their chance for a successful reversal procedure would be best at our center.
Preoperative Evaluation and Surgery
She was a healthy person and denied any known preexisting problems or menstrual abnormalities. We reviewed her tubal ligation operative and pathology reports that described at least 3 cm removed from each fallopian tube. We discussed their expectations and the risks and benefits of tubal reparative surgery.
During her surgical procedure and upon entering the abdominal cavity, we discovered brown fluid suggesting the presence of endometriosis. Close inspection of the right ovary revealed endometriosis inside of it and partially involving the right tube.
We removed the endometriosis and repaired the right tube. The left tube and ovary were normal. The left tube was repaired without difficulty.
She did well during the surgery. In the recovery room, we informed her and her husband of the unexpected endometriosis and the successful repair of both fallopian tubes.
Endometriosis
Endometriosis can be suspected in most patients based on a careful evaluation of a menstrual history. Many women with endometriosis will have extremely painful menstrual periods. Menstruation can be so painful patients may require large amounts of pain medications, miss time from work, or will have pelvic pain which drastically affects their personal lives. Many women give a history of severe pelvic pain, especially with intercourse and will plan their sexual activity based on their menstrual cycles. Many patients, like this one, can have minimal or no symptoms of endometriosis.
We could not have predicted this patient’s endometriosis in advance because of her absence of preexisting symptoms. Fortunately, we were able to successfully reverse her tubal ligation and remove the endometriosis at the same time.
We wish her well on her trip back to Monterrey California and hope a healthy pregnancy will be in her near future.


The initial method of laparoscopic tubal coagulation, in 1962, used a type of electrical current termed monopolar current. Monopolar tubal electrocoagulation was a popular type of laparoscopic sterilization through the 1970’s and 1980’s. The medical community began to realize that the complication rate from this form of electric surgery was higher than for other electric surgical methods of tubal sterilization. Sterilization procedures done by monopolar current have gradually been replaced with bipolar current.
The first reported sterilization using bipolar electrocoagulation was in 1972. This was done via a laparoscope inserted just under the belly button. During bipolar coagulation, the electrical current can be more precisely controlled, resulting in less tubal damage than monopolar coagulation. This sterilization procedure results in higher reversal success rates than monopolar electrocoagulation.
The Hulka clip is a small, gold plated stainless steel spring loaded clip. The clip in introduced into the abdominal cavity via a laparoscopic clip applicator. This image shows the open clip in the applicator and the tip of the laparoscope with its fiber optic lighted end. When the clip is placed across the fallopian tube, it is closed and a small spring holds the clip firmly across the tube. The Hulka clip has the advantage of damaging only a very small portion of the fallopian tube- approximately 7mm (the thickness of three quarters stacked on each other).
The Hulka clip causes bilateral tubal occlusion by squeezing a very small portion of the tube. The squeezed portion is deprived of its blood supply and eventually undergoes avascular necrosis (dies and is absorbed by the body). This causes the fallopian tube to be divided in half and the two ends to close up. The Hulka clip is held in place between the two divided tubal segments by a small amount of scar tissue which forms within the clip.
Many patients seem to imagine the fallopian tube is like a shoe lace which is tied up like a bow to prevent pregnancy. As tubal ligation reversal specialists, we wish it were that easy- then untying tied tubes would be easier!
At first, the dye will fill the uterine cavity. It is essential that the dye actually enter the fallopian tubes up to the point where the anastomosis was performed. Often, this does not occur due to spasm of the sphincter between the uterus and tubes (shown by the arrows) or from mucus or calcium deposits in the proximal tubal segments.
If the dye passes through the anastomosis sites, the fallopian tubes are open. Most radiologists do not consider the x-ray to show tubal patency (openness) unless dye spills into the abdominal cavity. When this happens, the diagnosis of tubal patency is conclusive.
We often see x-rays where dye has passed through the tubal anastomosis site, but has not yet spilled into the abdominal cavity. This is due to an insufficient amount of dye being injected into the tubes. The radiologist may mistakenly believe the tube is blocked when in reality it is open.
I Will Be Happy To Assist You
Tubal implantation is performed by making an incision through the uterine muscle. The incision is carried down into the uterine cavity. The tubal segment that has been separated from the uterus is opened and passed down until its proximal end is inside the uterine cavity. Before implanting the tube in the uterus, a suture is placed through the open end that goes inside the uterus. This suture is used to anchor the fallopian tube within the uterine cavity.
When the tube has been anchored inside the uterine cavity, sutures are placed in the uterine muscle around the implanted tube. Care must be taken to close the uterine incision sufficiently to allow healing, but not so tightly that it compresses or constricts the implanted tube. Tubal implantation is a more difficult operation to perform than tubal anastomosis. Tubal implantation accounts for 1% of tubal reversal procedures at 






