<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tubal Reversal Blog &#187; ivf risks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/tag/ivf-risks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog</link>
	<description>Tubal ligation reversal by Dr. Berger and Dr. Monteith at Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tubal Reversal vs IVF : Pregnancy Success Comparision</title>
		<link>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2009/tubal-ligation-reversal/tubal-reversal-vs-ivf-pregnancy-success-comparision.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2009/tubal-ligation-reversal/tubal-reversal-vs-ivf-pregnancy-success-comparision.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Monteith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dr berger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Monteith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy after tubal reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reversing tied tubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[untie tubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why tubal reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf pregnancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy success comparision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sterilization reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation reversal or in vitro fertilization (IVF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation reversal vs IVF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal ivf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/?p=2443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article compares the success of IVF and tubal ligation reversal in obtaining pregnancy. The data sources are the CDC 2006 report on assisted reproductive technology and the 2007 Tubal Reversal Pregnancy Report Study at Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center. Based on comparision of available data, tubal ligation reversal appears to be superior to IVF at acheiving success of pregnancy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2009/tubal-ligation-reversal/tubal-reversal-vs-ivf-pregnancy-success-comparision.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tubal Reversal After 40 : IVF Risks</title>
		<link>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2009/tubal-ligation-reversal/tubal-reversal-after-40-ivf-risks.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2009/tubal-ligation-reversal/tubal-reversal-after-40-ivf-risks.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 02:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Monteith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[dr berger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Monteith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reversing tied tubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[untie tubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why tubal reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blocked tubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-order multiple gestations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in vitro fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf cycle cancellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf cycle nonresponders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf embryo reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf multiple pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf risks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse tied tubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tubal Ligation Reversal After 40]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/?p=1590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IVF is widely accepted as a treatment for infertility for many causes including blocked or tied fallopian tubes. To maximize the pregnancy rate, it is a common practice to implant multiple embryos. This leads to the risk of multiple gestation, which occurs in 1 of 3 IVF pregnancies. The recent birth of octuplets in the US is a dramatic example of the risks of IVF.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2009/tubal-ligation-reversal/tubal-reversal-after-40-ivf-risks.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

