<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tubal Reversal Blog &#187; tubal cauterization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/tag/tubal-cauterization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog</link>
	<description>Tubal ligation reversal by Dr. Berger and Dr. Monteith at Chapel Hill Tubal Reversal Center.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:01:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Unexpected Finding During Tubal Ligation Reversal</title>
		<link>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2008/tubal-ligation-reversal/unexpected-finding-during-tubal-ligation-reversal.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2008/tubal-ligation-reversal/unexpected-finding-during-tubal-ligation-reversal.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles Monteith MD</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dr. Monteith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anastomosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapel hill tubal reveral center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fimbriated end]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in vitro fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ivf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ligation reversal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsurgical salpingosotomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placenta accreta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pomerory tubal ligation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal cauterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This case report is about an IVF nurse who was familiar the pros and cons of tubal ligation reversal vs IVF. She and her husband decided ligation reversal was a more appropriate path for them. She was a knowledgeable medical professional. She understood what it meant to have a tubal ligation. Many patients of all walks of life will have changes of heart as their lives change. Even medical professionals will make health care decisions for themselves that later may turn out to not be right for them. In her case, the surgical techniques of tubal anastomosis and microsurgical salpingostomy were used to repair the fallopian tubes.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2008/tubal-ligation-reversal/unexpected-finding-during-tubal-ligation-reversal.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tubal Reversal After Tubal Coagulation (Burned Tubes)</title>
		<link>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2007/pregnancy-after-tubal-reversal/tubal-coagulation-reversal.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2007/pregnancy-after-tubal-reversal/tubal-coagulation-reversal.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Berger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[pregnancy after tubal reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal illustrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipolar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burned tubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapel hill tubal reversal center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dr berger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fallopian tube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopolar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pregnancy rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal cauterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal coagulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal ligation reversal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tubal reversal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2007/pregnancy-after-tubal-reversal/tubal-coagulation-reversal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tubal Ligation by Coagulation or Cauterization
Bipolar tubal coagulation is a popular method of  female sterilization in the United States. This tubal ligation method is usually performed through laparoscopy. With the bipolar (two-poles) coagulator, the fallopian tube is grasped between two poles of electrical conducting forceps and electrical current is passed through the tube between [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tubal-reversal.net/blog/2007/pregnancy-after-tubal-reversal/tubal-coagulation-reversal.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
